Machine tool automation, particularly grinding machine automation, offers various returns on investment. Different shops notice different advantages, and sometimes shops overlook important benefits when they are deciding whether to automate.
The total cost of ownership of a machine tool makes a case for automation as well. The pie chart here shows the relative sizes of various costs involved in using a particular machine tool over the course of its life. The initial purchase price accounts for 14 percent of the total cost. Over time, the personnel required to operate the machine will account for much more than this—40 percent. Numbers such as these will vary from machine to machine. Still, even if the investment slice gets a little bigger because of automation, the overall pie—the total cost—gets smaller as a result of the personnel cost being reduced.
This is the case with almost any capital equipment purchase, and it’s the case with automation, too: When considering whether the purchase makes sense, price does not tell the whole story. Machine tool automation earns returns in various ways, some of which will be more or less valuable to different shops, and all of the returns on automation deserve to be figured into the analysis.
Of course, the most obvious promise of automation hardware is the chance to run unattended, or more specifically, the chance to keep producing with the machine tool after all of the operators have left for the day. An automated parts-loading system might make the machine tool seem considerably more expensive if it adds 30 percent to the overall price. However, what if that same parts-loading system allows the machine to continue making parts through 12 hours per day when no operator is present? The shop would therefore get twice the productive output of the machine for just 1.3 times the price.
John Richard is a sales director for grinding machine maker Fritz Studer AG (represented in the U.S. by United Grinding). This company’s grinding machines are used with various automation options in various applications at various price ranges, but Mr. Richard says the scenario of 30 percent more price for 100 percent more productive time is not at all unrealistic. In fact, he says it’s common. However, he also says that automation can pay its way even if unattended machining is not in the cards for the shop or plant. The various other sources of return on investment for automation include the following:
For example, if two grinding machines both rely on part-loading systems such as the one mentioned above, then each of those machines can run without an operator through a succession of workpieces instead of through just one machining cycle. As a result, the same operator that might have been busy attending to just one of these machines in the past can now be free to leave the machine for a longer period of time. He or she can then use this time to load the staging area of a second machine that is similarly equipped to run unattended—meaning this operator now keeps two machines producing instead of one. The extra price for the two part-loading systems therefore saves the shop the costs of both finding and employing an additional operator.
Mr. Richard says grinding machine users he consults with consider either long- or short-cycle-time parts to be more appropriate for automation. That is, different shops have different opinions, believing that either the long-running parts or short-running parts are better able to be automated. The perspective depends on the shop’s experience and what return on automation that shop has come to expect. Both types of parts are potentially suited to automation—it’s just that the reason for automating varies.
For parts with short cycle times, the principle reason to automate is productivity. If the part is relatively lightweight, an automated system is likely to load and unload the part faster than a human being can, and this loading time advantage will accumulate over time. The consistency of part load/unload times will also allow the plant to schedule machines more effectively.
For parts with long cycle times, the reason to automate is unattended machining. Filling the staging area of the automated loading system with a run of long-cycle-time parts can be enough to let the machine keep producing without an operator for hours into the night, perhaps all the way through to the morning.
However, Mr. Richard stresses that unattended machining is something larger than just “lights-out” machining. Even if the shop is staffed around the clock, what happens to the machine tool when the operator takes a lunch break or steps away from the machine to ask a question about the next job? With automation, the machine doesn’t have to sit idle if the machining cycle ends before the operator makes his or her way back to the machine. This extra productivity during otherwise idle periods of each typical day can sum to significantly more output over the course of the year.
One way to look at any machine tool purchase, says Mr. Richard, is to ask what portion of the machine’s output the shop will be able to put to use. The machine could potentially produce through any hour of the day. The hours that go unrealized therefore represent capacity the shop paid for without actually obtaining. In other words, the number of hours per day that the machine spends actually machining will determine how much of that machine—1/2 of the machine? 2/3 of it?—the shop is actually buying for the price. Automation increases the price, but overall, it lets the shop obtain a much higher percentage of the value of what it’s buying.
PLUS AUTO Tooling solution is one of the most professional EDM clamping systems’ manufacturer under US Maxxtooling group investment and management since 2012.